厙惇勛圖

Home   News   Features   Interviews   Magazine Archive   Symposium   Industry Awards  
Subscribe
厙惇勛圖
Leading the Way

Global 厙惇勛圖 Finance News and Commentary
≔ Menu
厙惇勛圖
Leading the Way

Global 厙惇勛圖 Finance News and Commentary
News by section
Subscribe
⨂ Close
  1. Home
  2. Industry news
  3. FCA fines TJM for facilitating Solo Capital cum-ex trades
Industry news

FCA fines TJM for facilitating Solo Capital cum-ex trades


18 July 2022 UK
Reporter: Bob Currie

Generic business image for news article
Image: AdobeStock/Vitalii Vodolazskyi
The Financial Conduct Authority has fined The TJM Partnership slightly more than 瞿2 million for control failures linked to cum-ex trading.

This is the third fine that the UK regulator has applied in connection with cum-ex and the largest penalty that it has imposed so far. These relate to trading activities that TJM conducted on behalf of Solo Group between January 2014 and November 2015, cases that have been extensively reported in 厙惇勛圖 Finance Times .

The FCA rules that trades executed by TJM on behalf of clients of Solo Group were characterised by a circular pattern of purported trades, characteristics which the regulator suggests were highly suggestive of financial crime.

This trading, it concludes, appears to have been conducted to enable withholding tax reclaims to be made in Denmark and Belgium. These trades were for an aggregate value of 瞿59 billion in Danish equities and 瞿20 billion in Belgium equities. The FCA indicates that TJM received a total commission of 瞿1.4 million for executing these trades, which represented a significant proportion of the firms revenue for the period.

TJM, which is now in administration, also failed to maintain adequate systems and controls to mitigate risk that it was being used to assist fraudulent trading and moneylaundering.

The FCA also referred to two other cases related to Solo Group where TJM failed to identify or escalate concerns about financial crime or moneylaundering. In another instance, it found that TJM had accepted money from a third party without conducting necessary due diligence.

In March, Denmark established an extradition treaty with the United Arab Emirates to lay the foundations for the extradition of Sanjay Shah, founder of Solo Capital, who was resident in Dubai. Shah and another British national are accused by the Danish government of having defrauded the Danish exchequer out of more than DKK 9 billion (approx 瞿1.5 billion) through illegal cum-ex trading and associated activities.

The FCA indicated that TJM had agreed to resolve all the issues of fact and liability that emerged from this case and, as a result, the fine was reduced by 30 per cent. Without this reduction under the FCAs Settlement Discount scheme, the regulator indicated that the fine would have been 瞿2,399,000.

In its Final Notice on the settlement, the regulator states that Solo Group purported to provide clearing and settlement services as custodian to its clients within a closed network. These clients were principally offshore companies, including entities incorporated in the British Virgin Islands and the Cayman Islands, along with US 401(k) pension plans.

According to the FCA, the Solo Group clients were often entities controlled by a small number of individuals, some of whom had previously worked for Solo Group, and which did not appear to have access to sufficient funds to settle the trades.

TJM was found to have executed OTC equity cum-ex trades for a value of approximately 瞿58.33 billion in Danish equities and 瞿19.71 billion in Belgian equities on behalf of Solo Capital clients during the period under investigation.

This reportedly featured a circular pattern of high-value OTC equity trades, back-to-back stock loan transactions and forward trades involving EU equities on or around the last day of the cum-dividend period. These trades were then subsequently unwound through trades conducted after record date.

The FCA says that OTC trades conducted by TJM were executed on platforms that did not have access to liquidity from public exchanges. These shares were reportedly filled within a matter of minutes, despite representing up to 24 per cent of the shares outstanding in the Danish-listed companies and up to 10 per cent of the equivalent Belgian stocks.

These OTC trades equated to an average of 47 times the total number of shares traded in the Danish stocks on the Danish stock exchange and 22 times the total number of the shares traded in the Belgian stocks on European exchanges on the last day that the shares were cum-dividend.

The purpose of this trading, The FCA concluded, was so that Solo Group could arrange for dividend credit advice slips (DCAS) to be created which purported to show that Solo clients were owners of the shares on the record date. In some cases, these DCAS were then used to reclaim withholding tax from the Danish and Belgium tax authorities under the relevant Double Taxation Treaties.

TJM staff were reportedly eager to maintain their relationship with Solo Group, which was referred to as the chicken that laid the golden egg, according to the FCAs Final Notice. Before taking on this Solo Group business, TJM was losing approximately 瞿20,000 to 瞿30,000 each month, according to this statement.

NO FEE, NO RISK
100% ON RETURNS If you invest in only one securities finance news source this year, make sure it is your free subscription to 厙惇勛圖 Finance Times
Advertisement
Subscribe today
Knowledge base

Explore our extensive directory to find all the essential contacts you need

Visit our directory →
Glossary terms in this article
→ Custodian
→ Dividend
→ Liquidity
→ Withholding Tax

Discover definitions, explanations and related news articles in our glossary

Visit our glossary →