UBS fined US$2.5 million for Reg SHO failures
06 October 2022 US
Image: Azat Valeev
FINRA has fined UBS 网爆吃瓜 LLC US$2.5 million for Regulation SHO violations and for supervisory failings extending over a nine-year period.
The US regulatory watchdog, which works under the supervision of the 网爆吃瓜 and Exchange Commission (SEC), ruled that UBS had failed to close out at least 5300 failure-to-deliver positions between 2009 and 2018.
Over the same timeframe, UBS had also routed or executed more than 73,000 short-sale trades without first having borrowed, or arranged to borrow, the shares.
FINRA also ruled that, between 2009 and August 2022, UBS鈥� supervisory systems and procedures were not 鈥渞easonably designed鈥� to meet compliance with Reg SHO Rule 204.
Specifically, UBS failed over this period to detect red flags in the firm鈥檚 books and records which indicated that its volume-weighted average price (VWAP) algorithm was routing certain buy-in orders as limit orders. Rule 204 specifies that limit orders, or other delayed orders, do not satisfy the close-out requirement.
Although UBS reviewed its Rule 204 systems annually, FINRA found that the bank had failed to recognise improper treatment of shares associated with a customer鈥檚 long sale and their availability for closing out a 鈥渇ailure to deliver鈥�.
Commenting on its judgement, FINRA explained that Reg SHO Rule 204 requires that firms take affirmative action to close out 鈥渇ailure to deliver鈥� positions resulting from equity short sales by borrowing or purchasing the securities before trading opens on the day after the settlement date.
When a firm does not close out a failure to deliver, Rule 204 prohibits the firm from accepting further short sale orders in this security without first borrowing, or arranging to borrow, the security. This is commonly known as the 鈥減enalty box鈥�.
The regulator concluded that UBS had only recognised its failure to enforce Rule 204鈥檚 鈥減enalty box鈥� after one of its systems had malfunctioned.
FINRA鈥檚 executive vice president and head of FINRA鈥檚 Department of Enforcement says: 鈥淭he short sale obligations imposed by Reg SHO afford critical protection to the markets and investors. Effective supervision focuses on every stage of a firm鈥檚 Rule 204 compliance and includes testing to confirm that systems and programming operate as intended, without unplanned consequences.鈥�
The SEC鈥檚 Regulation SHO requires that a broker-dealer must have reasonable grounds to believe that a security can be borrowed 鈥� and delivered when due 鈥� before executing a short-selling order in an equity security. The firm must satisfy this 鈥渓ocate鈥� requirement before effecting the short sale.
The US regulatory watchdog, which works under the supervision of the 网爆吃瓜 and Exchange Commission (SEC), ruled that UBS had failed to close out at least 5300 failure-to-deliver positions between 2009 and 2018.
Over the same timeframe, UBS had also routed or executed more than 73,000 short-sale trades without first having borrowed, or arranged to borrow, the shares.
FINRA also ruled that, between 2009 and August 2022, UBS鈥� supervisory systems and procedures were not 鈥渞easonably designed鈥� to meet compliance with Reg SHO Rule 204.
Specifically, UBS failed over this period to detect red flags in the firm鈥檚 books and records which indicated that its volume-weighted average price (VWAP) algorithm was routing certain buy-in orders as limit orders. Rule 204 specifies that limit orders, or other delayed orders, do not satisfy the close-out requirement.
Although UBS reviewed its Rule 204 systems annually, FINRA found that the bank had failed to recognise improper treatment of shares associated with a customer鈥檚 long sale and their availability for closing out a 鈥渇ailure to deliver鈥�.
Commenting on its judgement, FINRA explained that Reg SHO Rule 204 requires that firms take affirmative action to close out 鈥渇ailure to deliver鈥� positions resulting from equity short sales by borrowing or purchasing the securities before trading opens on the day after the settlement date.
When a firm does not close out a failure to deliver, Rule 204 prohibits the firm from accepting further short sale orders in this security without first borrowing, or arranging to borrow, the security. This is commonly known as the 鈥減enalty box鈥�.
The regulator concluded that UBS had only recognised its failure to enforce Rule 204鈥檚 鈥減enalty box鈥� after one of its systems had malfunctioned.
FINRA鈥檚 executive vice president and head of FINRA鈥檚 Department of Enforcement says: 鈥淭he short sale obligations imposed by Reg SHO afford critical protection to the markets and investors. Effective supervision focuses on every stage of a firm鈥檚 Rule 204 compliance and includes testing to confirm that systems and programming operate as intended, without unplanned consequences.鈥�
The SEC鈥檚 Regulation SHO requires that a broker-dealer must have reasonable grounds to believe that a security can be borrowed 鈥� and delivered when due 鈥� before executing a short-selling order in an equity security. The firm must satisfy this 鈥渓ocate鈥� requirement before effecting the short sale.
Next industry article →
HQLAX, J.P. Morgan, Wematch and Ownera confirm feasibility of cross-ledger DvP repo
HQLAX, J.P. Morgan, Wematch and Ownera confirm feasibility of cross-ledger DvP repo
NO FEE, NO RISK
100% ON RETURNS If you invest in only one securities finance news source this year, make sure it is your free subscription to 网爆吃瓜 Finance Times
100% ON RETURNS If you invest in only one securities finance news source this year, make sure it is your free subscription to 网爆吃瓜 Finance Times
