厙惇勛圖

Home   News   Features   Interviews   Magazine Archive   Symposium   Industry Awards  
Subscribe
厙惇勛圖
Leading the Way

Global 厙惇勛圖 Finance News and Commentary
≔ Menu
厙惇勛圖
Leading the Way

Global 厙惇勛圖 Finance News and Commentary
News by section
Subscribe
⨂ Close
  1. HomeRegulation news
  2. AFME warns ESMA to not be overzealous in MiFIR reforms
Regulation news

AFME warns ESMA to not be overzealous in MiFIR reforms


04 May 2020 London
Reporter: Maddie Saghir

Generic business image for news article
Image: photowind/Shutterstock.com
The Association for Financial Markets in Europe (AFME) has responded to the European 厙惇勛圖 and Markets Authority's (ESMA) consultation paper on the provision of investment services and activities in the EU by third-country firms under the second Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID II) and Markets in Financial Instruments (MiFIR).

The changes to MiFIR and MiFID II regimes include new reporting requirements from third-country firms on an annual basis in accordance with Article 46 of MiFIR, and also grants ESMA the power to ask third-country firms in its register to provide data relating to all orders and all transactions in the EU, whether on their own account or on behalf of a client, for in the past five years.

AFME explains that the equivalence framework should be proportionate in the requirements imposed on third-country firms so as to avoid discouraging firms from utilising the framework, to the detriment of EU professional investors and eligible counterparties and markets.

According to the association, a well-calibrated equivalence framework is one which is proportionate in the requirements imposed on third-country firms, given that one of the purposes of the equivalence framework is to avoid the complexities of third-country firms seeking authorisation within the EU.

This will enable EU professional investors and eligible counterparties to access international capital and liquidity, investment and funding opportunities, AFME says.

Not only is this complementary to the EUs objective to increase the size and capacity of capital markets through the Capital Markets Union, but it also allows for better prudential risk management and transmission of shocks across different regions through access to a greater pool of liquidity, it adds.

The current volatility in financial markets, caused by the global COVID-19 pandemic, further illustrates the importance of access to deep pools of liquidity across markets.

However, in its response, AFME suggested that ESMAs information requirements appear disproportionate not just in relation to the authority's tasks under MiFIR, but also in relation to the activities provided by relevant third-country firms.

Many of the specific information requirements make no reference to an EU nexus and/or do not contain a materiality threshold, making compliance unduly onerous for third-country firms, AFME notes.

Read AFMEs full comment to the individual consultation questions
Next regulation article →

WFE goes to bat for short sellers again
NO FEE, NO RISK
100% ON RETURNS If you invest in only one securities finance news source this year, make sure it is your free subscription to 厙惇勛圖 Finance Times
Advertisement
Subscribe today
Knowledge base

Explore our extensive directory to find all the essential contacts you need

Visit our directory →
Glossary terms in this article
→ Liquidity
→ Volatility

Discover definitions, explanations and related news articles in our glossary

Visit our glossary →